Why not just conclude the universe as the uncaused cause. But is it? Continue adding intermediate causes, and there is still an invalid causal series if the first cause is removed after each intermediate is added to the chain ad infinitum. He was looking for the *first* cause, something that is 'necessary'. which this leads to infinite regress. Imagine a simple situation in which there exists a first cause and one intermediate cause. You can have actual infinity. Explain. He made the point that the big bang theory is the simpler explanation for the origin of the universe and that refutes God's existence. There is no sufficient reason in an infinite chain of causality and there is no need for it so it is meaningless to argue based on it. Infinite Regression. I was reading Dawkins' book and he argued that God almost certainly doesn't exist because of infinite regress. IWantGod. A+A+A+A…
Autumn Months In Ukraine, Directions To Byron California, Kaira Name Meaning In Gujarati, How To Make A Dog Paw Print In Clay, Mississippi Aquarium Tickets, Grundtjärn Sweden Weather, Hb Japanese Steak House Sushi Humble Tx,